We address in this case three separate claims of error. First, we consider whether the trial court erred when it failed to instruct the jury, sua sponte, that a reasonable yet mistaken belief the victim consented to have sexual intercourse was a defense to a charge of rape. (People v. Mayberry (1975)
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Let's get started
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
PEOPLE v. DOMINGUEZ
No. S130860.
47 Cal.Rptr.3d 575 (2006)
39 Cal.4th 1141
140 P.3d 866
The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Fernando DOMINGUEZ, Defendant and Appellant.
Supreme Court of California.https://leagle.com/images/logo.png
August 28, 2006.
August 28, 2006.
Attorney(s) appearing for the Case
Dallas Sacher, Santa Clara, under appointment by the Supreme Court, for Defendant and Appellant.
Bill Lockyer, Attorney General, Manuel M. Medeiros, State Solicitor General, Robert R. Anderson, Chief Assistant Attorney General, Ronald A. Bass and Gerald A. Engler, Assistant Attorneys General, Laurence K. Sullivan, Eric D. Share and John H. Deist, Deputy Attorneys General, for Plaintiff and Respondent.
Supreme Court of California.
Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.
Cited Cases
- No Cases Found
Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.
